Thanks Sue for an article that examines a phenomenon that should concern all of us. Do you think that these issues are a result of pushback from a demographic that has traditionally been in control...but as minorities, including women, have attained more standing...want that control back?
Great article. I wonder though whether these recommendations are aimed more clearly at longer term strategies? Are the some more practical and tangible things that could be done sooner - both to convey to men and boys 'we hear you' and to address their particular needs?
The context of this question is of hearing some comments of disaffection from boys or men, and I'm also thinking about how this gender-based issue sits in the context of independent campaigns that are rightly supportive of girls and womens' needs to be safe, valued, involved, and all the rest.
1. So what are boys and men's particular needs? Inclusivity, social connectivity, mental health, physical health... Anything else?
2. And what can we do to provide for boys and men's needs ? Some ideas are more accessible mental health services, community activities (e.g. 'workshops' / 'men's sheds'), adventurous activities (e.g. mountain bike tracks), physical activities (e.g. pools, outdoor gyms)... Anything else?
I am a secondary school teacher in rural Australia and first notice my male students being red-pilled about 2 years ago. I wish the government would pay more attention to this problem.
I agree with you. Truth in political adversiting is more important than ever however susceptibility to misinformation is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including individual cognitive styles, education levels, and social environments as you would know as a teacher.
So I was curious how gender differences may play a role. It turns out they are part of a broader interplay of elements that determine an individual's likelihood of believing false information. Here is some interesting research.
This cautious approach leads women to be more discerning and skeptical of information, making them less likely to accept unverified claims at face value. In contrast, men's propensity for risk-taking may render them more open to engaging with and accepting misinformation without thorough scrutiny.
Do we not have enough responsible risk-taking opportunities anymore? As in, is this issue that boys and men experience a symptom of a broader shift towards risk-aversity in society?
Ways we could enable more healthy experiences with risk could involve - from younger ages upwards - encouraging more kids into Scouts & Nippers & other youth groups, adventure playgrounds & 'loose fit' play yards, enabling more kids to walk and to ride to school, adventure sports, camping, expeditions, etc...
Thank you again Sue for your passion for change and a depth of research to support your message. Always appreciated
Thanks Sue for an article that examines a phenomenon that should concern all of us. Do you think that these issues are a result of pushback from a demographic that has traditionally been in control...but as minorities, including women, have attained more standing...want that control back?
Great article. I wonder though whether these recommendations are aimed more clearly at longer term strategies? Are the some more practical and tangible things that could be done sooner - both to convey to men and boys 'we hear you' and to address their particular needs?
The context of this question is of hearing some comments of disaffection from boys or men, and I'm also thinking about how this gender-based issue sits in the context of independent campaigns that are rightly supportive of girls and womens' needs to be safe, valued, involved, and all the rest.
1. So what are boys and men's particular needs? Inclusivity, social connectivity, mental health, physical health... Anything else?
2. And what can we do to provide for boys and men's needs ? Some ideas are more accessible mental health services, community activities (e.g. 'workshops' / 'men's sheds'), adventurous activities (e.g. mountain bike tracks), physical activities (e.g. pools, outdoor gyms)... Anything else?
I am a secondary school teacher in rural Australia and first notice my male students being red-pilled about 2 years ago. I wish the government would pay more attention to this problem.
I agree with you. Truth in political adversiting is more important than ever however susceptibility to misinformation is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including individual cognitive styles, education levels, and social environments as you would know as a teacher.
So I was curious how gender differences may play a role. It turns out they are part of a broader interplay of elements that determine an individual's likelihood of believing false information. Here is some interesting research.
Research indicates that young men and boys may be more susceptible to believing falsehoods compared to their female counterparts, partly due to inherent differences in risk perception and management. Studies have consistently shown that men are generally more inclined toward risk-taking behaviours, while women tend to exhibit greater risk aversion. This heightened caution among women is often attributed to their increased sensitivity to potential losses and adverse outcomes. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/judgment-and-decision-making/article/gender-differences-in-risk-assessment-why-do-women-take-fewer-risks-than-men/3386EA020D940A2805EA3785662E7832?utm_source=chatgpt.com Cambridge University Press
This cautious approach leads women to be more discerning and skeptical of information, making them less likely to accept unverified claims at face value. In contrast, men's propensity for risk-taking may render them more open to engaging with and accepting misinformation without thorough scrutiny.
Onward we press
Do we not have enough responsible risk-taking opportunities anymore? As in, is this issue that boys and men experience a symptom of a broader shift towards risk-aversity in society?
Ways we could enable more healthy experiences with risk could involve - from younger ages upwards - encouraging more kids into Scouts & Nippers & other youth groups, adventure playgrounds & 'loose fit' play yards, enabling more kids to walk and to ride to school, adventure sports, camping, expeditions, etc...